337 So. 2d 455 - State v. Turner’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably 445 So. 2d 1171 - State v. Williams (1984), 500 So. 2d 355 - State v. Truitt (1987)
34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · United States v. Matlock · 316 So. 2d 372 - State v. Sneed · State v. Monroe · State v. Campbell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The state may not reserve part of its case-in-chief for rebuttal testimony, after the defense has put on its case and when it can no longer present evidence to rebut the state's case. This is contrary to statute, to ancient jurisprudence, and to rules of fair play. La.R.S. 15:282, State v. Snoddy, 332 So.2d 800 (La.1976); State v. Campbell, 263 La. 1058 , 270 So.2d 506 (1972); State v. Davis, 246 La. 383 , 164 So.2d 589 (1964); 2 Marr's Criminal Jurisprudence of Louisiana, Section 633 (1923). In State v. Monroe, 205 La. 285 , 17 So.2d 331, 332 (1944), we noted: `Rebutting evidence is that which is offered to explain, repel, counteract, or disprove facts given in evidence by the adverse party.' (Italics ours.) Again, in State v. Smith, 120 La. 530, 532 , 45 So. 415 (1908), we noted that rebuttal evidence is `evidence which has become relevant or important only as an effect of some evidence introduced by the other side'."”
7 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Perry · State v. Amato“the defendant is without right to rebut the prosecutor's rebuttal”
7 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Perry · State v. Harper“cannot always be enforced with cast iron inflexibility and must yield in its application to the sound discretion of the trial judge whose ruling will not be disturbed except in extreme cases, as where the evidence has been kept back deliberately for the purpose of deceiving and obtaining an undue advantage of defendant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.