Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 337 SO2D 74 - Mack v. State

Mack v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 1986
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 36 Ala. App. 592 - Hallman v. State · Jones v. Crawford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]f the pistol in evidence was not the one [used in the robbery], we do not see that defendant suffered any prejudicial injury by the mistake. The jury was certainly informed that a .22 pistol was brandished as a means of effectuating the robbery.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.