Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

337 So. 2d 863

Sima v. Sima

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 6, 1976

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1976-10-06

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1991

2 state decisions

Relies on 309 So. 2d 26 - Lee v. Lee

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1976-10-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Pursuant to the authority of Lee v. Lee, 309 So.2d 26, Fla.App.2d 1975, a trial court has jurisdiction to hear evidence and decide whether a modification of rehabilitative alimony should be granted or, if the circumstances warrant, a complete revisitation of the alimony question.

¶2Therefore, the trial court erred in holding that it was limited in its jurisdiction to only extending the rehabilitative alimony.

¶3Accordingly, the order appealed is reversed and the case remanded for a hearing in accordance with this opinion.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and GRIMES and SCHEB, JJ., concur.
/337/so2d/863 · .json · Public domain