Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 337 So. 2d 935 - Cain v. State

337 So. 2d 935 - Cain v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
September 2005
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently September 2005

9 state decisions

301976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Matlock · 278 So. 2d 464 - Royalty v. McAdory · 222 So. 2d 692 - Bullock v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Language contained in a sentencing order which amounts to conditions which the trial court has no authority to impose would be treated as surplusage and would not affect the enforcement of the valid portion of the sentence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"[T]he consent of one who possesses common authority over premises or effects is valid as against the absent, non-consenting person with whom that authority is shared... . [W]hen the prosecution seeks to justify a warrantless search by proof of voluntary consent, it is not limited to proof that consent was given by the defendant, but may show that permission to search was obtained from a third party who possessed common authority over or other sufficient relationship to the premises or effects sought to be inspected."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.