Ware v. Ware’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(a) After a child support order issued in another state has been registered in this state ... the responding tribunal of this state may modify that order only if, after notice and hearing, it finds that: .... (2) an individual party or the child is subject to the personal jurisdiction of the tribunal and all of the individual parties have filed a written consent in the issuing tribunal providing that a tribunal of this state may modify the support order and assume continuing, exclusive jurisdiction over the order.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Rosas v. Lopez

2. “[w]hen a statute speaks in jurisdictional terms or can be read in such terms, it is proper to read it as merely setting statutory limits on remedies or elements of claims for relief that courts may grant.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Rosas v. Lopez

3. “Mother failed to timely raise her claims regarding the alleged failure to comply with UIFSA. Accordingly, Mother's claims are not preserved, and she is not entitled to relief.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Rosas v. Lopez