Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 337 U.S. 325 - United States v. Cors

United States v. Cors’s Empirical Analysis

337 U.S. 325 · 1949

Citation profile

456
cited by 456 later decisions
13
cited 13 times by the Supreme Court
17
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

177 federal appellate · 6 district · 84 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 456 later decisions (13 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2022 · most notably United States v. Virginia Electric & Power Co. (1961), United States v. Reynolds (1970)

177 federal appellate · 6 district · 84 state decisions — followed in 17 states

1680194919501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1255

Relies on Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority · United States v. Miller · Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United States · Rescue Army v. Municipal Court of Los Angeles · United States ex rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. Powelson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 456 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “as in the case of land included in a proposed project of the government, the enhanced value reflects speculation as to what the government can be compelled to pay. That is a hold-up value, not a fair market value. That is a value which the government itself created and hence in fairness should not be required to pay.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “has been careful not to reduce the concept of 'just compensation' to a formula.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The special value to the condemner as distinguished from others who may or may not possess the power to condemn has long been excluded as an element of market value.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.