State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Rhode Island v. Innis · 113 Wis. 2d 61 - Sweet v. Berge · 31 Wis. 2d 110 - Lock v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[U]nder the first category, when the real controversy has not been fully tried, an appellate court may exercise its power of discretionary reversal without finding the probability of a different result on retrial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We possess a broad power of discretionary reversal pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.35 . . ., which provides authority to achieve justice in individual cases.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“need not address other issues when one is dispositive”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.