Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 338 Ark. 34 - Bruner v. Tadlock

Bruner v. Tadlock’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
January 2013
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2013

10 state decisions

60199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738A

Relies on May v. Anderson · Brock v. Pierce County · Harrison v. Matthews · Barnett v. Arkansas Transport Co., Inc. · Bunker v. Bunker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Both acts are designed to serve several purposes: to promote cooperation between states, to avoid relitigation and conflicting custody orders, to facilitate interstate enforcement of custody orders, to deter child abductions and improper retention of children, and to promote uniformity in jurisdictional laws so that custody and visitation may be determined in the state which can best decide the interest of the child.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “fundamental jurisdictional concept 'that the child's 'home state' should have preeminent authority to determine eustody and visitation and that authority should be respected elsewhere.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the state in which a child lived with a parent or a person acting as a parent for at least six (6) consecutive months immediately before the commencement of a child eustody proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.