Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 338 Ark. 445 - Miller v. State

Miller v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
February 2007
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Gault · Fare v. Michael C. · Sanford v. State · Britt v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In sum, the legislature has given a juvenile the statutory right to speak to a parent or guardian or to have one present upon the condition that the juvenile makes such a request. The legislature has not, however, imposed upon the police the duty to inform the juvenile of that right, and we cannot do so where the statute is silent. . . . Although we may question the prudence of giving a juvenile a right without imposing a corresponding duty on the police to inform the juvenile of that right, that is a policy decision properly left to the legislature, and not this court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(2) (A) No law enforcement officer shall question a juvenile who has been taken into custody for a delinquent act or criminal offense if the juvenile has indicated in any manner that he: * * * (ii) Wishes to speak with a parent or guardian or to have a parent or guardian present[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.