In Re Schiffman’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)
Relies on Boroff v. Tully · United States v. Mehrmanesh · Anderson v. Satterlee · Forbes v. Forbes (In Re Forbes) · Sunahara v. Burchard (In Re Sunahara)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Provide for the submission of all or such portion of future earnings or other future income of the debtor to the supervision and control of the trustee as is necessary for the execution of the plan, (emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Diaz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.