Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

338 F.2d 1017

Docket No. 7849.

Ortiz v. Cox

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1964-12-08

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1964

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1964-12-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico; Howard C. Bratton, Judge.

Jerry D. Sokolosky, Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellant.

L. D. Harris, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PICKETT and SETH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This is a sucessive application to the New Mexico Federal Court attacking the validity of the petitioner's State sentence. The trial Court allowed the petitioner to proceed in forma pauperis and upon examining the petition and the records of the Court, particularly the record in cause No. 4046, found that this petition raised no new grounds for relief not presented and adversely decided against the petitioner in cause No. 4046, entitled Ortis v. Woodruff.

¶2

The case was brought here on probable cause, and counsel was appointed to represent the petitioner. Upon consideration of the record and oral argument of counsel, the judgment of the trial Court is affirmed.

/338/f2d/1017 · .json · Public domain