Jacobus’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Gatorcom Corp v. Ll Bean Inc, Bd of Trustees Glazing Health v. Shannon Chambers (2019)
1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Buckley v. Valeo · Friends of the Earth Incorporateds v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc · O'Shea v. Littleton · Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National Union · First National Bank of Boston v. X Bellotti
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a defendant's voluntary cessation of a challenged practice does not deprive a federal court of its power to determine the legality of the practice”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[d]espite superseding events, an issue is not moot if there are present effects that are legally significant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(a) An individual or group may make contributions, subject only to the limitations of this chapter and AS 24.45, including the limitations on the maximum amounts set out in this section. (b) An individual may contribute not more than (1) $1,000 per year to a nongroup entity for the purpose of influencing the nomination or election of a candidate, to. a candidate, to an individual who conducts a write-in campaign as a candidate, or to a group that is not a political party; (2) $10,000 per year to a political party for the purpose of influencing the nomination or election of a candidate or candidates. (c) A group that is not a political party may contribute not more than (1) $2,000 per year to a candidate, or to an individual who conducts a write-in campaign as a candidate; (2) $2,000 per year to another group or a nongroup entity; or (3) $4,000 per year to a political party. (d) A political party may contribute to a candidate, or to an individual who conducts a write-in campaign, for the following offices an amount not to exceed . (1) $100,000 per year, if the election is for or lieutenant (2) $15,000 per year, if the election is for the state senate; (3) $10,000 per year, if the election is for the state house of representatives; and (4) $5,000 per year, if the election is for (A) delegate to a constitutional convention; (B) judge seeking retention; or «(C) municipal office. , (e) This section does not prohibit a candidate from using up to a total of $1,000 from campaign cont”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.