Reynolds v. McInnes’s Empirical Analysis
338 F.3d 1221 · 2003
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Powell · United States v. Swift & Co. · Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail · Harris v. Rivera · Taunt v. General Retirement System of Detroit
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“); Davis v. Butts, 290 F.3d 1297 (11th Cir.2002); Reynolds v. Roberts, 251 F.3d 1350 (11th Cir.2001) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1161, 122 S.Ct. 1171, 152 L.Ed.2d 115 (2002); Reynolds v. Roberts, 207 F.3d 1288 , 1292-93 (11th Cir.2000) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Reynolds v. McInnes“); Reynolds v. Roberts, 202 F.3d 1303 (11th Cir.2000) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.