Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 338 F.3d 1259 - Carr v. Tatangelo

Carr v. Tatangelo’s Empirical Analysis

338 F.3d 1259 · 2003

Citation profile

85
cited by 85 later decisions
1
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 85 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Mercado v. City of Orlando (2005), Cockrell v. Sparks (2007)

14 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions

480200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Anderson v. Creighton · Graham v. Connor · Malley v. Briggs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]ll claims that law enforcement officers have used excessive force — deadly or not — in the course of an arrest, investigatory stop, or other “seizure” of a free citizen should' be analyzed under the Fourth Amendment and its “reasonableness” standard, rather than under a “substantive due process” approach. Because the Fourth Amendment pro--vides an explicit textual source of constitutional protection against this sort of physically intrusive governmental conduct, that Amendment, not the more generalized notion of “substantive due process,” must be the guide for analyzing these claims.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Importantly, the alleged expert's report is unsworn. Only 'pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file , together with affidavits , can be considered by the district court in reviewing a summary judgment motion. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c) (emphasis added).'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A reasonable but mistaken belief that probable cause exists for using deadly force is not actionable under § 1983.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.