In Re: Robert B Surrick’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
7 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably Price v. US, State v. Gomes (2021)
7 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Olano · Yakus v. United States · Bouie v. City of Columbia · North Carolina v. Rice · In the Matter of John Ruffalo Jr
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) a legal controversy that is real and not hypothetical, (2) a legal controversy that affects an individual in a concrete manner so as to provide the factual predicate for reasoned adjudication, and (3) a legal controversy with sufficiently adverse parties so as to sharpen the issues for judicial resolution.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“has the inherent authority ... to discipline attorneys who appear before it.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] case will be considered moot, and therefore nonjusticiable as involving no case or controversy, if the issues presented are no longer live or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.