Andrade’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably USA v. BestCare Laboratory Services (2020), United States v. Brocato (2021)
2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Liteky et al United States · United States v. Gaubert · Berkovitz v. United States · Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp. · Cinel v. Connick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must (1) demonstrate that the alleged comment, action, or circumstance was of ‘extrajudicial’ origin, (2) place the offending event into the context of the entire trial, and (3) do so by an ‘objective’ observer’s standard. Moreover, [petitioner] must demonstrate that the district court’s refusal to recuse was not merely erroneous, but, rather, an abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“opinions formed ... on the basis of facts ... or events occurring in the course of the current proceedings, or of prior proceedings,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Roman v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.