Tow Operators Working to Protect Their Right to Operate on the Streets of Kansas City v. Kansas City’s Empirical Analysis
338 F.3d 873 · 2003
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McGee v. County of Orange · Vig v. United States · City of Columbus v. Ours Garage & Wrecker Service, Inc. · Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. Southworth · National Bank of Commerce v. Dow Chemical Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3), a State, political subdivision of a State, or political authority of 2 or more States may not enact or enforce a law, regulation, or other provision having the force and effect of law related to a price, route, or service of any motor carrier ... or any motor private carrier, broker, or freight forwarder with respect to the transportation of property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.