United States v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
338 F.3d 947 · 2003
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2021
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc. · Boggs v. Boggs · Donna Rae Egelhoff v. Samantha Egelhoff Kate Breiner David Egelhoff · United States v. Pioneer American Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The IRS has authority to proceed against [pensioner's] interest in any ERISA plan benefits and is not constrained by ERISA's anti-alienation provision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“ERISA provides a mechanism for enforcing QDROs, and this mechanism supersedes any contrary state law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.