Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 338 FAPPX 379 - Antonelli v. Lappin

Antonelli v. Lappin’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Daniels v. United States · Lackawanna County District Attorney v. Coss · United States v. Becerra · Royal v. Tombone

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not for the purpose of declaring the 1997 conviction invalid for all purposes but rather for the limited purpose of determining whether the 1997 conviction requires the forfeiture of nineteen months of 'street time,' as determined by the [United States] Parole Commission.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “effect of this forfeiture ... is that nineteen months of parole have now been 'tacked on' to the end of the present sentence he is serving, thereby 'making the time [he must] serve 19 months longer than it would otherwise be'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “in the context of its effect on his outstanding sentence of parole ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.