Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 338 FSUPP 18 - Douglas v. Hampton

Douglas v. Hampton’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
November 1981
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 5 district ·

Relationships

Applies 5 U.S.C. § 1301 · 5 U.S.C. § 1302 · 5 U.S.C. § 3301 (Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998) · 5 U.S.C. § 7151

Relies on Griggs v. Duke Power Co. · Holden v. Finch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Plaintiffs' contention that remand [to the Commission] is not appropriate because the Commission is a party is without merit. Remand may be ordered where the Commission not only is a party and has vigorously defended the issues being litigated, but has refused to entertain the matter when it was first brought before it. . . . Plaintiffs also advance the contention that the Commission has prejudged every important issue and that further proceedings before it under the new regulations would be futile. There has, however, been no showing that the Commission will act other than in accordance with law in developing the factual foundation upon which its decision should be based. 338 F.Supp. at 23 . (Emphasis added.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.