Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 338 F. Supp. 2d 1216 - Roberts v. Printup

338 F. Supp. 2d 1216 - Roberts v. Printup’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
September 2005
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. · Glenn v. Fleming

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is a factual dispute as to whether [Roberts] contacted Shelter agent Hack-erott to inquire whether she m[ight] have a claim. [Roberts] claims that the agent told her she had no claim, while Hackerott expressly denies such a conversation occurred. In any event, the court considers this factual dispute immaterial, because [Roberts] testified that she did not rely on Hackerott’s information....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.