Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 338 Mo. 360 - Prichard v. Dubinsky

Prichard v. Dubinsky’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
March 1985
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Shinn v. United Railways Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the court should not have permitted plaintiff to amend the petition at the close of the evidence by increasing the $10,000 prayed for as damages to $20,000,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The amendment was not made in the presence of the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.