Bloecher v. Duerbeck

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 10, 1936

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1936-03-10

Relies on Vitale v. Duerbeck · Roberts v. Hargis

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1936-03-10

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 1996 · most notably Goslin v. Kurn (1943), Carver v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. (1952)

2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1The foregoing opinion by BRADLEY, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. All the judges concur. *556

¶2

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING. It is not necessary to go into detail about the motion for rehearing in the instant case. We refer to and adopt, as applicable here, what is said on the motion for rehearing in the companion case of Vitale v. Duerbeck, 338 Mo. 556,96 S.W.2d 691, which opinion on the motion for rehearing in the companion case is handed down concurrently with the filing of this memorandum. The motion for rehearing should be overruled, and it is so ordered. Ferguson and Hyde, CC., concur.