Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 338 N.W.2d 248 - State v. Trott

State v. Trott’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
3
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 59 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably State v. James (1985), State v. Ecker (1994)

1 federal appellate · 59 state decisions

20019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Olson · State v. Goulette · Kochevar v. State · State v. Hoaglund · State v. Moss

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The main purpose of the accuracy requirement is to protect a defendant from pleading guilty to a more serious offense than he could be convicted of were he to insist on his right to trial.... The purpose of the voluntariness requirement is to insure that the defendant is not pleading guilty because of improper pressures. The purpose of the requirement that the plea be intelligent is to insure that the defendant understands the charges, understands the rights he is waiving by pleading guilty, and understands the consequences of his plea.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The usual way in which the factual basis requirement is satisfied is for the court to ask the defendant to express in his own words what happened. The defendant’s statement usually will suggest questions to the court which then, with the assistance of counsel, can interrogate the defendant in further detail.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “After discussion before the court in which counsel participated, neither the defendant nor his counsel made any motion * * * to withdraw the plea for a mistake.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.