Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 338 N.W.2d 886 - State v. Sheets

State v. Sheets’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
5
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 2017

6 state decisions

201983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Sunclades · State v. Johnson · St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Nyce

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The general rule is that when the word 'day' is used it means calendar day which includes the entire day from midnight to midnight .... We find no language in the [45-day statutory requirement] that indicates an intention to measure the time twenty-four hours from a given event.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.