Li v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
June 2015
most recently cited
4 district · 12 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Clerk's Papers (CP) at 20. ¶ 3 In 2004, Ms. Bureta and her same-sex partner traveled from Spokane to Multnomah County, Oregon to be married after an official there ordered the County to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. But the Oregon Supreme Court held,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the licenses issued to same-sex couples in Multnomah County . . . were issued without authority and were void at the time that they were issued.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or legally recognized as a marriage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.