Pierce v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
93
cited by 93 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
91 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 1 U.S.C. § 109
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Hill v. Lockhart · United States v. Chambers · Cherry v. State · Dove v. Gold Kist, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The longstanding common law view is that a “continued prosecution necessarily depend[s] upon the continued life of the statute which the prosecution seeks to apply. In case a statute is repealed or rendered inoperative, no further proceedings can be had to enforce it in pending prosecutions unless competent authority has kept the statute alive for that purpose.... Prosecution for crimes is but an application or enforcement of the law, and if the prosecution continues the law must continue to vivify it.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bryant“The application of a new or amended criminal statute may prompt a defendant to allege a violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause, arguing the court may not apply a statute enacted or amended after the date of an offense in his case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Shands“will reverse the PCR judge's decision when it is controlled by an error of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bryant v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.