338 So. 2d 1229 - Gentry v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “The right to counsel at a lineup proceeding as held in United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 , 87 S.Ct. 1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967), was thereafter specifically limited to a post-indictment situation in which a lineup is held after the formal initiation of judicial criminal proceedings. Kirby v. Illinois, 406 U.S. 682 , 92 S.Ct. 1877 , 32 L.Ed.2d 411 (1972). This Court has adopted the rule of Kirby and held that the right to counsel does not apply to pre-indictment lineups. How ard v. State, 319 So.2d 219 (1975); Hobson v. State, 285 So.2d 464 (Miss.1973); Allen v. State, 274 So.2d 136 (Miss.1973); Chandler v. State, 272 So.2d 641 (Miss.1973).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 163 So. 3d 240 - Marlon Latodd Howell v. State of Mississippi

2. “[Upon request] the defendant should be permitted to inspect tangible evidence which may be used against him... .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 488 So. 2d 1343 - Thomas v. State