Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 338 SO2D 488 - Locke v. State

Locke v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
September 2000
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 2000

10 state decisions

501976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hollenquest v. State · 53 Ala. App. 501 - Hollenquest v. State · 23 Ala. App. 113 - Carruth v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is not necessary for a conviction in a criminal case that evidence be direct, positive, and of the eyewitness variety, but a defendant may be convicted on circumstantial evidence if it is compatible with the test of sufficiency required in such cases.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.