State v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently June 2009
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 277 So. 2d 126 - State v. Prieur · 278 So. 2d 781 - State v. Moore · State v. Kreller · 307 So. 2d 594 - State v. Banks · 297 So. 2d 190 - State v. Medlock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“IsNor did defendant’s plea of ‘not guilty’, without more, make evidence of extraneous offenses admissible to prove ‘intent’ or ‘guilty knowledge’. To permit the exceptionally-permitted evidence of extraneous offenses, the evidence must indicate that these are real and genuine matters at issue, independent of the defendant’s general claim of innocence posed by his plea of not guilty. “The mere theory that a plea of not guilty puts everything material at issue is not enough for this purpose. The prosecution cannot credit the accused with fancy defenses in order to rebut them at the outset with some damning piece of evidence.” [Citations omitted].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[i]n spite of the words that `it shall be unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally...' to do the prohibited acts, the statute requires no more than general criminal intent. LSA-R.S. 14:11. A distribution offense is a crime requiring only general criminal intent. Such intent is established by mere proof of voluntary distribution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“However, the prosecution cannot introduce an extraneous offense under the guise of proving”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.