¶1is of the opinion the writ should be granted because the jury was not clearly instructed that excessive force by the bartender would completely obviate the theory of self-defense; also there was evidence from which the jury could have found reasonably that the bar owner was guilty of primary negligence in either employing a person with dangerous propensities or in not stopping the argument before the injury occurred.
338 So. 2d 702
Morris v. Guidry
Decided November 3, 1976
Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1976-11-03
Decided 1976-11-03