Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

338 So. 2d 85

Barrington v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 13, 1976

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1976-10-13

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1981

1 state decisions

Relies on 337 So. 2d 788 - Tibbs v. State · McKee v. State · Thomas v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1976-10-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellant seeks review of his conviction of the crime of sexual battery (F.S. 794.011(4)(a)) and his resulting sentence of life imprisonment. Oúr examination of the record reveals that the evidence was sufficient, if believed by the jury, (which apparently it was) to sustain the conviction. (See McKee v. State, Sup.Ct.Fla.1947, 159 Fla. 794, 33 So.2d 50; Truluck v. State, Sup.Ct. Fla.1959, 108 So.2d 748; Thomas v. State, Sup.Ct.Fla.1964, 167 So.2d 309 and Tibbs v. State, Sup.Ct.Fla.1976, 337 So.2d 788, opinion filed July 28, 1976. However, the state candidly agrees that the sentence imposed exceeds that permitted by law. (See F.S. 794.011(4)(e) and F.S. 775.082, Florida Statutes 1973). Accordingly, we affirm the conviction but reverse and remand for the purpose of the trial judge correcting the sentence. It shall not be necessary for appellant to be present at the time the sentence is corrected.

¶2Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

BOYER, C. J., and RAWLS and McCORD, JJ., concur.
/338/so2d/85 · .json · Public domain