Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 338 SW2D 44 - Fowler v. Woodring

Fowler v. Woodring’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2003
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2003

6 state decisions

4019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Hinojosa · Winkel v. Streicher · Crowson v. Crowson · St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Kern · Schubel v. Bonacker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`However clearly an intention not expressed in the will may be proved by extrinsic evidence, the rule of law requiring wills to be in writing stands as an insuperable barrier against carrying the intention thus proved into execution.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.