Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 338 SW2D 908 - Burns v. Brewster

Burns v. Brewster’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2001
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 2001

5 state decisions

3019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Plumbers Supply Co. v. Lanter · Associated Electric Co. v. Fitch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““No case shall be assigned for trial without giving reasonable notice to all parties not in default of the day on which a trial date will be fixed.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “True, it is a familiar rule that parties litigant, once in court, either for themselves or through their attorneys, must keep track of their cases and take notice of the time of trial when the date has been fixed according to rules. Of course, if they have actual and seasonable notice thereof, they may be estopped from raising omission of a strict compliance with the rules.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.