Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 338 SW3D 725 - Jones v. State

Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 405th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Illinois v. Gates · Franks v. Delaware · Brinegar v. United States · Spinelli v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “facts indicating ongoing criminal activity have long been recognized as diminishing the importance of establishing a specific and immediate time period in the affidavit: “Where the affidavit recites a mere isolated violation it would not be unreasonable to- imply that probable cause dwindles rather quickly with the passage- -of time. However,- where ■ the affidavit properly recites facts indicating .activity of a protracted and continuous nature, a course of conduct, the passage of time becomes less significant.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “because the affidavit adequately suggested a continuing criminal operation, including `recently' obtained information from the first confidential informant, from the affiant's own investigation, and from the second confidential informant who made the controlled buy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the temporal references within the affidavit allowed the magistrate to determine there was a substantial basis for concluding that a search would uncover evidence of wrongdoing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.