State v. Saunders’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 2020
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Vollmer v. Luety · State v. Ndina · State v. Huebner · 84 Wis. 2d 145 - McClelland v. State · Stuart v. Weisflog's Showroom Gallery, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a trial judge is not expected to raise an evidentiary issue mid-trial on his or her own initiative. We conclude that the trial court's failure to sua sponte engage in a Daubert analysis of Rodriguez's cell phone mapping testimony was not plain error. The State's Closing Argument was not Plain Error. ¶ 17. Cameron also contends that he is entitled to a new trial because the State impermissibly vouched for the credibility of a key witness — Smith—when the State told the jury that Smith”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.