Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 338 WIS2D 610 - State v. Henley

State v. Henley’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. · Tumey v. State of Ohio · In the Matters of Lee Roy Murchison and John Whites · Offutt v. United States · Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “may sometimes bar trial by judges who have no actual bias and who would do their very best to weigh the scales of justice equally between contending parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment was violated when [Justice Benjamin] denied a recusal motion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[knew] that the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia would consider the appeal in the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.