Warren v. Kelso’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
October 2007
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Middleton v. State · Smith v. Smith · Doe v. Union Pacific Railroad · Tate v. Sharpe · Haase v. Starnes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When more than one claim for relief is presented in an action, whether as a claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third party claim, or when multiple parties are involved, the court may direct the entry of a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties only upon an express determination, supported by specific factual findings, that there is no just reason for delay and upon an express direction for the entry of judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Norman v. Norman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.