Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 339 BR 464 - In Re Rybka

In Re Rybka’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
May 2020
most recently cited

1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 2020

1 district ·

50200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 326 · 11 U.S.C. § 327 · 11 U.S.C. § 330 · 11 U.S.C. § 363 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 11 U.S.C. § 542 · 11 U.S.C. § 554 · 11 U.S.C. § 726

Relies on Southwestern Media, Inc. v. Rau · 27 1157 74903 Andreuccetti · In re Schultz Manufacturing Fabricating Co. · In Re: Lan Associates · 32 530 76224 Singson Ludwig Shlimovitz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In a case under chapter 7 or 11, the court may allow reasonable compensation under section 330 of this title of the trustee for the trustee’s services, payable after the trustee renders such services, not to exceed 25 percent on the first $5,000 or less, 10 percent on any amount in excess of $5,000 but not in excess of $50,000, 5 percent on any amount in excess of $50,000 but not in excess of $1,000,000, and reasonable compensation not to exceed 3 percent of such moneys in excess of $1,000,000, upon all moneys disbursed or turned over in the case by the trustee to parties in interest, excluding the debtor, but including holders of secured claims.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.