Securities and Exchange Commission v. Canandaigua Enterprises Corporation, Debtor-Appellee. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Finger Lakes Racing Association, Inc., Debtor-Appellee’s Empirical Analysis
339 F.2d 14 · 1964
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 1993 · most notably Norwest Bank Worthington v. Ahlers (1988), Kham & Nate's Shoes No. 2, Inc. v. First Bank of Whiting (1990)
16 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co. · Securities & Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Co. · Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Boyd · General Stores Corp. v. Shlensky · Grayson-robinson Stores, Inc. v. Securities & Exchange Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“But we do not read that decision as precluding a court of appeals from ruling that the need for a readjudgment of publicly held debt creates a presumption in favor of Chapter X, whereas a case calling only for modification of the claims of trade creditors or others who have had private dealings with the debtor is presumptively to be handled under Chapter XI.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“in most cases where the debtor's securities are publicly held c. X will afford the more appropriate remedy,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.