Homer I. Henderson v. Donovan B. Grable’s Empirical Analysis
339 F.2d 465 · 1965
Citation profile
2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently October 1981 · most notably Reese v. Hurst (1981), Samuel P. McCutchen Jr., and Jack E. Eskilson v. Francis A. Oliver (1966)
2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re Draeger · George E. Hall, Jr. v. Louis B. Taylor · Charles B. Swain and Albert G. Schuessler v. Bob C. Crittendon · In re Kelley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“be given the broadest construction the language will reasonably bear without resort to the specification from which it originated * * *. 26 Although appellant draws our attention to the above-quoted portion of Henderson, we feel he has in effect placed undue reliance on the first sentence without sufficient regard for the second. We must, in the words of Henderson, examine the expression”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“whether a reasonable interpretation, but one not so broad as to do violence to the language”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Rather it is our opinion that the circumstances here require that the unambiguous term”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.