Roach v. General Development Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
339 F.2d 583 · 1965
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
January 1975
most recently cited
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Cline v. Kaplan · Louisville Trust Company v. Leonard Comingor · Williams v. Austrian · Peters v. Lines · Continental Casualty Co. v. White
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Section 2, sub. a (7), dealing with the jurisdiction of courts of bankrupt cy, contains the specific qualification “except as herein otherwise provided.” Appellant ignores this qualification in his argument. In Williams v. Austrian, 331 U.S. 642 , [644, 67 S.Ct. 1443 , 91 L.Ed. 1718 ], the Supreme Court held that this exception had reference to Section 23 of the Bankruptcy Act hereinabove discussed. This question is well analyzed and discussed in In re Houston Seed Co., 122 F.Supp. 340 , D.C.Ala., to which reference is made. We are of the opinion that Section 2, sub. a(7) of the Bankruptcy Act is not applicable to the issue presently before us. In re Pennington, 339 F.2d at 584-585 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.