Jones v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
339 F.2d 585 · 1964
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
June 1974
most recently cited
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Garcia v. Steele · 226 F. Supp. 304 - Austin v. Harris · Rosheisen v. Steele
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is our opinion that the authority to classify federal prisoners for the purposes of confinement, care and treatment, has been conferred exclusively upon the Attorney General, and that his determinations, made in the exercise of that authority, are not subject to review in habeas corpus proceedings.” Id. at 278”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sutton v. Ciccone
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.