Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 339 F.2d 676 - H. L. Thorndal, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Petroleum Corporation of America, Bankrupt v. Smith, Wild, Beebe & Cades

H. L. Thorndal, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Petroleum Corporation of America, Bankrupt v. Smith, Wild, Beebe & Cades’s Empirical Analysis

339 F.2d 676 · 1965

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
June 2001
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2001

13 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

7019651970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jaffke v. Dunham · Parissi v. Telechron, Inc. · In the Matter of Acme Furnace Fitting Company, a Corporation, Bankrupt. Eusebius J. Biggs v. Gerald P. Grace, as Trustee in Bankruptcy · Milton v. United States · Brennan v. United States Gypsum Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The fact that the referee did not mark the petition filed at the time it was originally received is of no consequence . . . [A] person filing an instrument should not be responsible for the failure of a receiving public official to perform his duty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A successful party in the District Court may sustain its judgment on any ground that finds support in the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.