Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 339 F.2d 925 - United States v. Joseph D'argento, United States of America v. Maryland National Insurance Company

United States v. Joseph D'argento, United States of America v. Maryland National Insurance Company’s Empirical Analysis

339 F.2d 925 · 1965

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
February 1999
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently February 1999

15 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

1201965197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte George Milburn · United States v. Davis · United States v. Carolina Casualty Insurance · United States v. Schlenvogt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(f) Forfeiture. (1) Declaration. If there is a breach of condition of a bond, the district court shall declare a forfeiture of the bail. (2) Setting aside. The court may direct that a forfeiture be set aside, upon such conditions as the court may impose, if it appears that justice does not require the enforcement of the forfeiture, (emphasis added) (4) Remission. After entry of such judgment [of default 1 ], the court may remit it in whole or in part under the conditions applying to the setting aside of forfeiture in paragraph (2) of this subdivision, (emphasis added)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.