Llc v. Llc I Llc Sa’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
6 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc. · Zervos v. Verizon New York, Inc. · Rg Group Inc Rg v. Horn & Hardart Company · Painewebber Inc. v. Bybyk
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“certain and imminent harm for which a monetary award does not adequately compensate.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“... Wisdom expressly negotiated for and received the right to veto certain transactions with which it disagreed before those transactions commenced, a right that is irretrievably lost upon breach, and may not be compensable by non-speculative damages. The only way to render the provision truly viable is to enforce it. Otherwise, the stronger partner can simply ignore the provision and then argue, as Appellants do here, that the deal was a good one and, therefore, no harm, irreparable or otherwise, results. Accordingly, the only available remedy for a breach of this provision is undoing the breach and restoring Wisdom to a pre-breach posture.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Preliminary injunctive relief is appropriate when a plaintiff establishes “(1) the likelihood of irreparable injury in the absence of such an injunction, and (2) either (a) likelihood of success on the merits or (b) sufficiently serious questions going to the merits to make them a fair ground for litigation plus a balance of hardships tipping decidedly in [plaintiffs] favor.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.