Ruiz v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
339 F.3d 39 · 2003
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Bagley · McCambridge v. Hall · Barrett v. United States · United States v. Ruiz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Brady claims are subject to the same prejudice requirement as ineffective-assistance claims”); Marshall v. Hendricks, 307 F.3d 36 , 85 n.37 (3d Cir. 2002) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Waiters v. Lee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.