Kesel v. United Parcel Service, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
339 F.3d 849 · 2003
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 49 U.S.C. § 40105
Relies on New York Nh Hartford Co v. Nothnagle · Wendt v. Host International, Inc. · Deiro v. American Airlines, Inc. · Klicker v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. · Read-Rite Corporation and American Homes Assurance Company v. Burlington Air Express, Ltd Cargolux Airlines International, s.a.,denying
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We agree with the district court that the Warsaw Convention ... does not apply to [plaintiff's] claims. [Plaintiff] alleges that the package disappeared, not during the flight from Odessa to the United States, but after it arrived at UPS's Kentucky warehouse. Federal common law governs liability limits on shipments by air within the United States.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.