Renner v. Vitcov’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
February 1981
most recently cited
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1359
Relies on Williamson v. Gilmer · McSparran v. Weist · Groh v. Brooks v. Shallway Outdoor Advertising Co. · Law v. Converse · Hoffman v. Lenyo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In determining whether or not diversity has been artificially created, inter alia, such factors as the identity of the representative and his relationship to the party represented; the .scope of the representative’s powers and duties; any special capacity or experience which the representative may possess with respect to the purpose of his appointment; whether there exists a non-diverse party, such as a parent in a suit for injuries to a child, who might more normally be expected to represent the interests involved; whether those seeking the appointment of the representative express any particular reason for selecting an out-of-state person; and whether, apart from the appointment of an out-of-state representative, the suit is one wholly local in nature.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.