Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 339 FSUPP 273 - Prettner v. Aston

Prettner v. Aston’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
December 2011
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2011

6 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

18019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78A (§ 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 45 U.S.C. § 151 (Railway Labor Act) · 45 U.S.C. § 152 (Railway Labor Act)

Relies on Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co. · Elgin Ry Co v. Burley · Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad · Zorn v. Anderson · 316 F. Supp. 151 - Jacobs v. Tenney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “would have been wholly speculative and was not required”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[Tjhis portion of Section 27 “does not require that the violative act or acts form the core of the claim. All that is required is but one act within the forum district which represents more than an immaterial part of the allegedly illegal events.” Moreover, we have heretofore held the act committed in the forum district “need not itself constitute a violation of the Act in order to establish venue.” The question, rather, is whether the act upon which venue is predicated is “an integral part of” or “of material importance to” the commission of the violation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.